Latest Headlines
Laurel Leader Criticized for Chastity Object Lesson
By Peter_Mary

SODA SPRINGS, ID—Local Laurel Advisor Judy Comstock of the Soda Springs 5th Ward says she’s tired of hearing the complaints by angry young women and their parents after an object lesson she used in her Laurel lesson apparently fell flat. 

“It’s a real challenge to keep these girls interested in the lesson,” complained Comstock when asked about the object lesson gone awry.  “Especially when it comes to chastity, it’s not like these girls haven’t heard it all before.  They’ve seen the rose with all the petals pulled off.  They’ve seen the bread with the butter licked off.  They’ve seen the nail pounded in a board.  I thought the hankie idea was a fresh, new way to make an old point.” 

The lesson began when Comstock carefully removed a clean, white handkerchief from a box, and explained that, “this hankie is like your virtue.”  When she asked the girls to blow their noses in it and pass it around, demonstrating that “no worthy young returned missionary would want you now,” the lesson quickly deteriorated into chaos.

“It was positively the grossest thing I have ever seen,” says Ginger Bailey, Laurel class president.  “By the time that handkerchief got to me it was like totally disgusting, but Sister Comstock was like all encouraging us to blow our noses in it and pass it on.  I thought for sure I was going to yak.  We’re all like, ‘hello, we have standards here!’” Other class members felt the same way.

“The first girl, Whitney Snow, was like, ‘okay,’ and she just honked away and passed it on,” reports class member Deena Cooper.  “After that, most of us were like, ‘no way,’ but Sister Comstock was getting all pushy, so some of the other girls did it, too.  Julie Jamison left the class retching and she told me she hurled twice in the bathroom.”  When asked if she herself blew her nose, Cooper quietly admitted that she had.

“Sister Comstock just made you feel like if you didn’t, you didn’t love her or something.  There was like this total pressure to blow your nose.  I didn’t want to, but I felt like I had to.”

Brenda Sorenson, the Young Women’s President says she witnessed the hankie metaphor, and though she was somewhat concerned about hygiene, felt the overall effect was exactly what they were looking for.

“It disturbs me that the girls seem to be struggling with this,” admits Sorenson. “Satan is so strong in this last dispensation that apparently even these poor Laurels can’t resist his awful influence.  To my way of thinking, it’s a sign of spiritual wavering that the girls are offended by such plain truths.  I know without a doubt that this was exactly the kind of lesson we needed,” Sorenson added, “but in hindsight, it’s probably a good thing Judy didn’t use her original object lesson, which involved toilet paper.”

The Young Women’s Presidency sent cards to all the Laurels expressing their love for each of them and asking them to kindly come back to Sister Comstock’s classes.





 

Comments:

“When asked if she herself blew her nose, Cooper quietly admitted that she had.” 

There is a sentence I never thought would crack me up, but it did! Well done!!!

Posted by wintersfootsteps  on  12/29  at  07:09 PM

They should all be grateful that Sister Comstock didn’t go with her original object lesson idea. I am so trying to erase that image from my mind.

Posted by crazy cat lady  on  12/30  at  01:59 AM

Is she kidding?

The power of Satan is what kept these girls from choosing to blow their nose in an already-used hankie?

Its a ‘sign of spiritual wavering’ because they didn’t follow along and do what everyone else did?

Stupid Cult.  Ridiculous people forcing kids to do ridiculous things in order to prove their faith and loyalty.  Just training them for adult life in the church, I guess.

Posted by Astarte Moonsilver  on  12/30  at  08:28 PM

That’s what I love about the LDS church: Fresh new ways of making stale old points!

Posted by chemonro  on  12/30  at  09:53 PM

wow.  I was subjected to the “chewed gum” lesson and thought that was gross.

Interesting that those girls are making waves. NOBODY in my class would have dared.

Posted by Steph118  on  12/31  at  05:10 PM

We DO all understand this is satire, right?  Please bow your head and say, “Yes.”  PLEASE…

Peep Stone Editor

Posted by peter_mary  on  12/31  at  05:42 PM

It’s hard to satirize an organization that’s so whacky to begin with!

Posted by chemonro  on  01/01  at  01:32 AM

*bows head* Yes.

Well done. LOL

Posted by beenthere  on  01/02  at  10:54 PM

*trying to catch breath… tears pooling at the sides of my eyes*

Before now I hadn’t actually laughed out loud reading something for a very long time… (though I admit I have typed LOL several times in chat.)

Just great!

Posted by Mo  on  01/03  at  10:49 AM

Peter_Mary, you were never a Laurel, so how did you nail this so well?  It completely cracked me up, especially the beginning:  It’s hard to keep the girls interested…  hahaha!

Posted by Jannypanny  on  01/03  at  07:50 PM

Jannypanny, A little known fact is that I am multiple personality disordered, and one of my personalities is a 16 year old Mormon girl.  Peter_Mary

Edited to add:  OMG, like, SO don’t pay any attention to him!  He’s such a retard!  He’s always, like, “I hear voices in my head,” but so do all my friends, and THEY aren’t on meds!  He SO annoys me…just act like he isn’t here.  It works for the rest of us.  Mary_Peter

Posted by peter_mary  on  01/03  at  09:56 PM

Dude!  We need to hang out.              -the 16 year old mormon Jannypanny

Posted by Jannypanny  on  01/03  at  10:27 PM

Totally!  Like, I’ll be in St. George trying to keep Peter_mary from making us look like total dorks for the February Southern Utah Postmo Chapter meeting, so we should chill.  You should like totally text me, and we’ll hang!  Mary_Peter

Posted by peter_mary  on  01/04  at  08:24 AM

Oh fer sure, that’d be totally awesome!  So like PM your number to me Mary_Peter and I’ll text ya like the day before or whatever.  Hangin’ with you will so totally rawk!  ~Jannypanny

Posted by Jannypanny  on  01/04  at  08:43 PM

When my sons were in seminary, four years apart, they both ate ‘the tootsie roll’ if you know what I mean. They did this independently of each other and neither knew about the other until it came up in conversation years later. I was so proud!

Posted by Brigs Buddy  on  01/05  at  12:36 AM

Coming from a naive little Utah girl, what does “ate ‘the tootsie roll’” mean?

Posted by beenthere  on  01/05  at  12:59 PM

This was a little Utah object lesson where an unwrapped tootsie roll was passed around the room and then offered for consumption. Since everyone in the room had touched it, of course no one in their right mind would want to eat it, just like no one would want to marry someone who had been, um, handled.

Posted by Brigs Buddy  on  01/05  at  07:35 PM

Ahhhhh. I figured, like the liked cupcake thing. Just making sure….boys and eating the tootsie roll….the mental image made me come to a slightly different conclusion. LOL

Posted by beenthere  on  01/05  at  09:30 PM

Our object lesson was a peice of buttered bread, that someone had already licked the butter off..clever, eh? 
What makes me really sad is that this mind control programming runs so deep that I still have these little “freakouts” sometimes when I “fornicate”, and I really hate that the f*&%$!!n Mormon Church still has it’s slimy tentacles on my sexuality!

Posted by redwoodrebelgirl  on  01/07  at  03:21 AM

With these types of object lessons I always wondered why the whole point was to not be the “handled” while being a “handler” was never criticized. Hypocrisy.

Posted by dleed  on  01/13  at  03:35 AM

I think that it’s sad that people write off a mountain of good because of a teaspoon of oddness.

Posted by Steph  on  01/14  at  01:39 AM

Dear Steph,

Sort of like how it’s sad that people refuse a whole tray of brownies because of just a little dog poop…

Peep Stone Editor

Posted by peter_mary  on  01/14  at  03:39 PM

Thank you dleed, for pointing out what I think is a very important reality.  LDS girls who act on their natural sexuality suffer in incredible, and inhuman ways [not to give away too many of my own secrets… wink] but little or nothing seems to happen to the boys!  Not that ANYONE should be punished for expressing what Goddess has given us, but if punishment is meted out anyway, at least it could be equal!

Posted by redwoodrebelgirl  on  01/15  at  12:08 AM

That little bit of dog poop is up for interpretation, and where I see the little bit of dog poop is where slackers who found an excuse is concerned.

Posted by Steph  on  01/15  at  03:58 PM

Redwood: have you seen the recent STD stats?  They are reaching epidemic proportions.  It’s not a bad thing to lead a moral life.

Posted by Steph  on  01/15  at  04:00 PM

Steph, it appears the lessons worked where you are concerned.  Please take a moment to ask yourself if you wouldn’t rather own, fully appreciate and enjoy your wonderful, natural sexuality than believe people who have told you it is evil.  If not, that’s your choice.  As for me, I will never believe my body is anything less than amazingly sensual and sexual again; responsible as I am with that knowledge.

Posted by Jannypanny  on  01/15  at  04:30 PM

Steph—

Yes, I am quite informed about STDs, as I test for them regularly.  It’s part of being a sexually responsible adult. 

Since divorcing the LDS Church, I have lived well over a decade as a gloriously, orgasmically,  sexually active adult.  It may shock you to know that I have NEVER had an STD!

Posted by redwoodrebelgirl  on  01/15  at  11:10 PM

Steph, sexual abstinence may be a few people’s idea of what constitutes a moral life, but it certainly is NOT a Universal “moral”.
There are MANY ideas about what defines a “moral life”.

Posted by redwoodrebelgirl  on  01/15  at  11:25 PM

Just always wear a condom whenever you lick a cupcake! *doe eyes*

Posted by chemonro  on  01/16  at  01:44 AM

I always wondered how “these girls” got spoiled and unworthy by theirselves. Doesn’t it take another person to help with that? OH! That’s right it is a guys “right” to do that. All this talk about the “BAD” girls and NO talk about the bad boys(or grown men) being at fault. Amazing huh?

Posted by twystedsis1  on  01/16  at  07:16 PM

Yeah, you remember we had to support the boys and not wear immodest clothing or we would be labled bad.  the church is really bad for girl’s self esteem.  Some of the horiniest girls in school were the mormon girls. sheesh!

Posted by Seen the light  on  01/19  at  06:01 PM

First, I’m laughing out loud reading the article - then I find myself laughing so hard I’m crying at the “dog poop in brownies” comment - then find myself trying to remember how to inhale at the comment about wearing a condom when you lick a cupcake.  The only part that confuses me - since when will boys NOT eat a piece of candy, even if handled by other people?  This is the same group that came up with the 10 sec rule, isn’t it?

Posted by duryen  on  05/04  at  09:48 PM

http://www.salamandersociety.com/parables/

The dog poop in the cake really takes the cake. Here’s a great answer to the dog poop object lesson.

Posted by Dahli-mama  on  05/05  at  05:52 PM

I want my cupcake licked :-(

Posted by coffeenow  on  06/17  at  10:02 AM

Ok, so I want to buy a BMW M6 Coupe.  Do you think I’d reject a test ride simply because another man sat in the seat?

Posted by kerry.hales57  on  07/04  at  04:06 PM

I think they should have blown their noses into a condom.

Posted by DaveManCan  on  07/13  at  05:20 PM

Post your comments here:

 

Email a friend: