PDA

View Full Version : 6th Article of Faith (Part I)


grape_nephi
25th November 2006, 01:23 PM
Article of Faith 6 states “We believe in the same organization that existed in the Primitive Church, namely, apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, evangelists, and so forth.”

In my discussions with avid Mormons on this topic they have mentioned that the Mormon Church is a restoration of the Church that Christ set up on the earth as handed down to the Apostles. However, is this really the case? What was this early church like? Does it resemble the Mormon Church, church meetings or organizations?

In speaking of the early Christian Church it is my belief that Paul was a relative late-comer. He had not met Jesus during Jesus’ ministry and so was not one of the early disciples. Jesus was a Jew and being an itinerant rabbi he would have been very familiar with Jewish law and practice as well as worship.

Before addressing the offices within the church I am going to touch upon the church itself and the topic of worship.

Worship was and is very important to the Jewish people and comes from three sources; the temple, the synagogue tradition, and the scriptures. Worship or the system of worship for the Jews and also for early Christians came initially from the scriptures. It is in the Pentateuch that temple worship was laid out. Not only the physical layout of the temple (and before that the tabernacle) proper but also the rites and forms or worship that was to take place in the temple (specifically in Exodus 25 through 27). These rites and forms of worship were not secret. They were very sacred but were well known by the Jews and by anyone who could read the Jewish scriptures. For the early Jews and Christians worship followed a heavenly model. Luckily we have examples of this in Isaiah 6, Daniel 7 or Revelations 4 and 5. Worship on earth was patterned after worship in heaven.

During the Babylonian exile the Jews moved to a new form of worship, the synagogue. Because the temple was no longer available for worship, the Jews took part in an alternate form of worship that would continue up to the present day. And it was this type of worship that Jesus would have been most familiar with as a child and rabbi. The synagogue liturgy (work of the people, i.e. worship) follows a fairly set pattern:

• The Litany – The opening to the service consisting of prayers.
• The Confession – A confession of God’s faithfulness.
• Intercessory Prayer – Preparation for the scripture reading.
• Scripture Readings – Readings from the Law and the Prophets. When Jesus is reported to have read and taught in the synagogue, it was during this portion that he read.
• Preaching – The reading was followed by a sermon on the meaning of the scriptures that were read. Jesus is reported to have expounded upon the reading he made in the synagogue at the outset of his ministry.
• Benediction – Prayers in conclusion of the worship service.

In a Reformed Jewish synagogue that I was able to attend in July 2006, the liturgy had the following form:

• Warm-up – Morning blessings and Psalms.
• The Shema – The watchword of the Jewish faith is given and God is thanked.
• The Amidah – Prayers of thanks and peace are given.
• The Torah Service – Readings from the Laws and the Prophets.
• After Torah Service – Concluding prayers are given.

After the Jewish worship service a communal meal is held. Communal meals were very important to the Jews and many times of worship included meals. For example Passover.

This form of worship and the organization of the liturgy would have been very familiar to not only Jesus but also to the apostles and the rest of the disciples of Jesus. In careful reading of the New Testament, in sections that detail worship before the main missions to the Gentiles, we may see that the Apostles and disciples not only worshiped in the synagogue but also held a Eucharistic meal on the Lord’s Day (Sunday). And they also took part in worship at the temple.

Acts 2
41 ¶ Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,
47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.

The Apostles continued with their normal daily practices, simply adding in the christological additions to the synagogal practice. This was the start of the early church, a grounding in the synagogue, continuing those practices and this same motif was transferred to the Christian liturgy when the primary liturgy was performed on the Lord’s Day (Sunday). The early Christian Church transformed into the Proto-Orthodox church after the changes to theology was instituted by Paul and accepted by Gentile converts and today this same tradition has been handed down in the Eastern Orthodox Church that traces its lineage and authority to the Apostles.

What must also be understood is that Jesus was a Jew and would have worshipped God in the same fashion that Jews worshipped in their synagogal service. If we look to the writing of Luke we may see that the opening of Jesus’ ministry is grounded in the synagogue. In Luke chapter 4 we have a depiction of Jesus acting as the Sheliach Tsibbur (representative of the people) when he read from the prophets. This person was also expected to give the devotions. Jesus would have ascendedd the bema and led the people in prayers and the shema followed later by the readings from the prophets and the devotion or interpretation of the prophets. I cannot stress enough the factt that this form of worshop was followed by not only the followers of Jesus but by Jesus himself.

Even the Book of Mormon, which claims to be a second witness of Jesus Christ, mentions synagogue and temple worship in Alma 16:13:

“16:13 And Alma and Amulek went forth preaching repentance unto the people in their
temples, and in their sanctuaries, and also in their synagogues, which was built after the
manner of the Jews.”

Synagogues are also mentioned in Alma 21, Alma 26, Alma 31, Alma 32, etc. The synangogue was set up in a consistent manner. The building faced Jerusalem and had an ark on the jerusalem end that help the scriptures. In the center of the main room was the bema which held a lectern for reading and for giving any sermons or interpretations of the Law and the prophets. I am not aware of any archaeological finds in the New World that could be considered a synagogue. However, in Syria, old Christian churches have beed excavated that are consistent with this type of architecture.

Since Jesus and his followers were Jewish, patterning the early Christian liturgy after the practices of the Jewish synagogue is understandable. In fact, the early followers of Jesus in Jerusalem would have attended Sabbath synagogue meetings and then at sundown (the end of the day for the Jews) attended a newly instituted Christian eucharistic service with an agape meal.

The basic layout of the Mormon sacrament service is as follows:

• Greeting
• Opening Hymn
• Opening prayer
• Sacrament hymn
• Sacrament prayers and passing of the sacrament
• Various songs and talks given by the laity
• Closing Hymn
• Closing prayer

The layout of the early Christian liturgy is as follows:

“Synaxis” or Open Meeting Eucharist
Greeting and Response Greeting and Response
Lections interspersed with Psalmody Kiss of Peace
Psalmody Offertory
Sermon Eucharistic Prayer
Dismissal of Catechumens Fraction
Intercessory Prayers Communion
Benediction Benediction


The synaxis is derived from the synagogue liturgy. Because of the persecutions during early Christian times, the synaxis was separate from the eucharist and all non-Christians were removed from the eucharistic service before it began. After the time of Constantine the synaxis and the eucharist were joined into one service. The eucharistic service is shown as early as 150 CE in the writings of Justin Martyr in his First Apology.

I have personally attended services in the Russian Orthodox Church, the Greek Orthodox Church, Jewish Synagogues, and various protestant churches. The closest liturgies to synagogue worship are in the liturgy of the Orthodox church as noted above. The Mormon worship service does not resemble (except in the very simplest sense) the synagogue service or the service as used in the early Christian church. So the question of whether or not the Mormon Church is a restoration of the early Christian church in my estimation, at least in regards to the liturgy, is a resounding; No.


The Eucharist

To understand the significance of the Eucharist it is important to understand the aspects of worship. And to understand this one must come to the realization that worship begins in heaven and our worship should pattern heavenly worship.

As noted previously the Old and New Testaments record instances of worship in heaven. These always occur before the throne of God and include such things as adoration and hymns of praise. Part of the Old Testament is the setting up of worship in the Tabernacle and then ultimately in the Temple. As an example of one of the scenes in the Old Testament that detail heavenly worship, refer to Isaiah chapter 6:

“1 In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple.
2 Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly.
3 And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.
4 And the posts of the door moved at the voice of him that cried, and the house was filled with smoke.
5 Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD of hosts.
6 Then flew one of the seraphims unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar:
7 And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin purged. “

Verses 6 and 7 are a foreshadowing of the Eucharist and this act by the seraphim purged the sin from Isaiah. Other recordings are given throughout the Bible including Revelations 4 and 5 that show the order of worship at the throne of God.

Naturally, if one is taking part in true worship one will follow in the footsteps given by the prophets which the early Christians did. Hebrews chapter 8 verses 1 through 6 show how worship is to proceed:

“ 1 Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
2 A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
3 For every high priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man have somewhat also to offer.
4 For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:
5 Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.
6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.”

I should note that in the original Greek the word translated into English as minister is the word leitourgos which means liturgist or the one who officiates over the liturgy. Liturgical worship is not optional in true Christian worship but is necessary and correct. A closer translation of verse 6 would be “But now he has obtained a better liturgy, because he is the mediator of a better covenant...”. This now brings us to the question of “What is the Eucharist and why is it important?”

As given in the Gospels, during the Last Supper, the Lord instituted the Eucharist. Prior to that Jesus taught that he was the bread of life. There is no getting around the fact that Jesus’ body and blood were divine and in taking them a person could have redemption.

John 6:
“48 I am that bread of life.
49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. “

Matthew 26:

“26 ¶ And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, band blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body.
27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. “

Luke 22:

“19 ¶ And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. “

Mark 14:

“22 ¶ And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body.
23 And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.
24 And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many. “

The Mormon Church’s sacrament is a remembrance only of the death of Christ.

D&C 20:
“75 It is expedient that the church meet together often to partake of bread and wine in the remembrance of the Lord Jesus;
76 And the elder or priest shall administer it; and after this manner shall he administer it-he shall kneel with the church and call upon the Father in solemn prayer, saying:
77 O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this bread to the souls of all those who partake of it, that they may eat in remembrance of the body of thy Son, and witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son, and always remember him and keep his commandments which he has given them; that they may always have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.
78 The manner of administering the wine-he shall take the cup also, and say:
79 O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this wine to the souls of all those who drink of it, that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them; that they may witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they do always remember him, that they may have his Spirit to be with them. Amen. “

It should be noted that although wine is mentioned in this section of the Doctrine and Covenants water is now used in the Mormon Church.

The partaking of the Eucharist is not just a sign of remembrance but is the culmination of the feast where the partaker takes part in the mystery of he who reigns at the right hand of God. Who gave his life so that all may live. Early Christians such as Justin Martyr in the early to mid 2nd century understood the Eucharist to be the body and blood of Christ:

"For we do not receive these things as though they were ordinary food and drink... the food over which the thanksgiving has been spoken becomes the flesh and blood of the incarnate Jesus in order to nourish and transform our flesh and blood."

The Eucharist was to transform a person’s life, their spiritual life and like real bread and wine nourished the person. The Eucharist became a life-giving mystery. Each believer through the Holy Spirit was nurtured through grace sacramentally and was afforded spiritual sustenance.

This communion could not simply be added to Synagogue worship during the early years of the Church. In the early church the Lord’s Supper (Eucharist, Sacrament, Communion) was celebrated at the end of the Fellowship meal (agape). This meal was held Saturday evening after the end of the Sabbath. This partaking of the Eucharist was done in thanksgiving for the Grace of Christ and for the sacrifice that he performed for the good of all. This agape meal continued and was understood by Messianic Jews who followed Jesus to be a culmination of the Passover tradition where Christ made the ultimate sacrifice for sin.

The symbology and meaning of the Eucharist are very important to traditional and especially first century Christianity. Mormonism misses this symbology by removing the Body and Blood from their sacramental service and relegating the “believer” to only remembering the death of the Lord. Mormonism has further distanced itself from the roots of Christianity by not only changing the liturgy to be more of a corporate meeting, far from synagogal roots, and by removing the saving elements of the Eucharist that was so important to early Christians.

grape_nephi
25th November 2006, 01:23 PM
So, in addressing the claim that the Mormon Church is a restoration of the early Christian Church, what church are Mormons referring to? If they are referring to the earliest synagogal styled church then the Mormons should worship on Saturday with the sacrament given after sundown on Saturday. If it is the Church as espoused by Paul then the primary leaders should be the Bishops and not a Prophet. If it is some Gnostic or other Christian sect where is the documentation showing that this other sect was the one set up by Jesus and maintained by His followers? The burden of proof sits with the Mormons to show how they have the absolute truth as they maintain.

With this introduction on the early church and worship we may now move on to the organization of the church.

The Mormon Church is organized as follows:

Image from Microsoft Encarta Web Service.

Stakes are lead by a Stake President and two councilors. These men are High Priests in the Melchezedek or Higher/Greater Priesthood. Assisting the Stake Presidency is the Stake High Council, a body of High Priests who visit the local branches of the Church (called Wards) to council the membership and bring messages from the Stake Presidency. Wards are the local congregations and are lead by a bishop and two councilors. The bishop is the primary local ecclesiastical leader.

You will not find in the Primitive church as laid down by the apostles and early bishops the positions of stake president, high councilmen, or a presiding bishopric. You will also not find the apostles leading the primitive church as a united body with a prophet and two counselors at the head.

It is my belief that Joseph Smith modeled his church loosely after some titles taken from the New Testament but certainly gave them his own flair and did not use the organization that was laid out by the early church leaders. Also, we have only the teachings of Paul, who was not one of Jesus’ original followers while he lived, that delineates some of the “offices” in the church.

So, where did Smith obtain the ideas for at least some of the church positions?

First we must look to Ephesians 4:11 in the New Testament: And he gave some apostles and some prophets and some evangelists and some pastors and some teachers. Here Paul is indicating some of the workers in the church that were appointed. Unfortunately he does not list each one's duty. This is from the King James version of the Bible. I believe that Smith was a student of the Bible. Perhaps even a serious student. These positions were given for the work of the ministry. That is the spreading of the Word. The word apostle comes from the Greek word apostolous (apostolous), meaning a delegate, messenger, one sent forth with orders. As far as I can tell it does not intone the meaning of someone in charge. With the apostles we have evangelists (euaggelistas in Greek “euaggelistas”). The Greek word signifies a biblical and ecclesiastical worker, a bringer of good tidings, an evangelist. This name is given to those heralds of salvation through Christ who are not apostles. Along with these two we have prophets, shepherds and teachers. However, it appears that these ministers of Christ's word were not in charge of the church. The Didache (a first century Christian treatise) states that apostles and prophets should stay only a short while in any area. If they stay longer they are false teachers. So, if a ministry was or is necessary there will be these traveling teachers as noted in Ephesians but they do not run the church.

In The Mormon Hierarchy: Origins of Power, author D. Michael Quinn on page 126 discusses Brigham Young, the Quorum of the Twelve and the succession after the death of Joseph Smith. Previous to Smith’s death, the Twelve’s role had been that of a traveling “high council”. This council had jurisdiction over areas where stakes were formed. This is more in line with the duties of the original apostles as recounted in the New Testament and early Christian writings. It was after the death of Smith and the wresting of power by Brigham Young that the Twelve took complete authority at this crucial junction in Mormon history.

But what of established home-churches/congregations or the early church itself?

The Bishop and the Deacon.

The two primary offices noted in the New Testament and other early Christian writings are those of the bishop and the deacon. First Timothy chapter 3 is quite explicit on some of the qualifications for a bishop and deacon. First and foremost the bishop must be the husband of one wife. In chapter 3 verse 1 it also states that people should aspire to the office of a bishop. My feeling is that it is not just being called to the position but working towards the position. Clement Chapter XLII discusses the order of the ministers in the church and covers the offices of bishop and deacon. Clement was a first century Christian writer.

“The apostles have preached the Gospel to us from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ [has done so] from God. Christ therefore was sent forth by God, and the apostles by Christ. Both these appointments, then, were made in an orderly way, according to the will of God. Having therefore received their orders, and being fully assured by the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, and establish in the word of God, with full assurance of the Holy Ghost, they went forth proclaiming that the kingdom of God was at hand. And thus preaching through countries and cities, they appointed the first-fruits [of their labours], having first proved them by the Spirit, to be bishops and deacons of those who should afterwards believe. Nor was this any new thing, since indeed many ages before it was written concerning bishops and deacons. For thus saith the Scripture in a certain place, "I will appoint their bishops in righteousness, and their deacons in faith."”

Deacons are workers in the church. The word deacon comes from the Greek diakonias (diakonias) which means service, ministering, especially those who execute the commands of others. In first Timothy 3:12 it states that deacons should be the husbands of one wife. If Joseph Smith knew the New Testament inside and out he would not have missed this. In the Mormon Church young men at 12 years old are ordained as deacons. Polycarp in his epistle to Philipi lays out the duties of deacons, youths and virgins. He treated them separately and at least as to deacons and youth we can say that they were not the same. It is also a possibility that there were female deacons.

We also know that the church had elders (presbyters). Polycarp outlines their duties in his epistle to Philipi in chapter VI.

“Knowing, then, that "God is not mocked," we ought to walk worthy of His commandment and glory. In like manner should the deacons be blameless before the face of His righteousness, as being the servants of God and Christ, and not of men. They must not be slanderers, double-tongued, or lovers of money, but temperate in all things, compassionate, industrious, walking according to the truth of the Lord, who was the servant of all. If we please Him in this present world, we shall receive also the future world, according as He has promised to us that He will raise us again from the dead, and that if we live worthily of Him, "we shall also reign together with Him," provided only we believe. In like manner, let the young men also be blameless in all things, being especially careful to preserve purity, and keeping themselves in, as with a bridle, from every kind of evil. For it is well that they should be cut off from the lusts that are in the world, since "every lust warreth against the spirit; " and "neither fornicators, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, shall inherit the kingdom of God," nor those who do things inconsistent and unbecoming. Wherefore, it is needful to abstain from all these things, being subject to the presbyters [elders] and deacons, as unto God and Christ. The virgins also must walk in a blameless and pure conscience.”

In the centuries following the death of Jesus, some Christians had difficulties with the rise of the new Christian priesthood and the ecclesiastical leaders and the rules laid down by them. In the Nag Hammadi texts, one of the books, called Testimony of Truth, discusses this. Elaine Pagels in her book The Origin of Satan touches upon this subject: “But the author of the Testimony, reflecting on his own alienation from the majority of “worldly” Christians, suddenly believes he understands Jesus’ warning to his disciples to “beware of the leaven of the scribes and pharisees” (Mark 8:15). Jesus’ words are not to be taken literally, as if they referred only to Jewish teachers; instead, taken symbolically, they warn against Christian teachers like the author of Barnabas or the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, who invoke the Scriptures to sanction ordinary life. According to the Testimony, the “scribes and Pharisees” and the “blind guides” against whom Jesus warns (Matt. 23) are none other than the majority of Christians – Christians who have been tricked into worshiping not God but supernatural “rulers” who are less than divine.”

1 Corinthians 12:4 states “There are different kinds of gifts, but the same Spirit; and different kinds of ministries and the same Lord”. I interpret this scripture to mean that as there are many different types of spiritual gifts, there are also many different types of ministries. That there is not just one type of ministry as in a one-size-fits-all type of mentality.

It is my contention that the Mormon Church, although it has some positions that are based off of New Testament examples, is not completely patterned after the primitive Christian Church.